Checking misinformation on public family trees

 

                                                  The children of Samuel Tripp as determined by my research

I received an email from FamilySearch about ancestors' weddings in this month and signed in to the website. Their interface has changed a lot and there is now a box encouraging you to build your family tree. Clicking around, I happened on a tree that included my great grandmother, Charlotte Tripp only her name was spelt Sharlot. Looking into the information on the tree further, I saw that Sharlot was listed as the eldest child of Samuel Charles Tripp and Mary Ann Roden, on the FamilySearch tree. Well, the father was correct but not the mother. Samuel Tripp had at least one child with Catherine Matheson, my 2 x great grandmother. I'm not sure which woman was the mother of Samuel's second child, Sarah May. The mother could have been Catherine, perhaps she died in childbirth, or Sarah May could have been the first child born to Samuel and Mary Ann.

It seems likely that the source for information on the family could have been the 1871 census for Fenelon, Victoria North, Ontario. The information on the entry for the Trips (sp) shows Samuel, wife Ann, daughters Sharlott age 5, Sarah age 2 and Mary 9/12. Sharlott disappeared by the 1881 census but there were more children to take her place. It would be easy to infer that Sharlott had died. But Sharlott, or more properly, Charlotte (often called Lottie) happened to be recorded twice in the 1871 census. She was also living with her grandfather, Keneth Mathison, in Fenelon, Victoria North, Ontario. Her uncle Angus (written as Agness) and aunt Heneretta Mathison were also part of the household. By the time the 1881 census was taken, Charlotte Tripp and her aunt, Henrietta Matheson, were living with the Thompson (sp) family, with another of Charlotte's aunts, Margaret Thomson.

It was a confusing situation to parse out originally and I was happy to see the family situation playing out in the official records. Now it appears that I will need to keep an eye on the information put on the FamilySearch tree so that misinformation doesn't take over the legitimate facts. Maybe it's time to check out WikiTree more fully too to make sure there is no more misinformation being entered about this family line.