A neglected family branch

 

                                                               Molly's Reach in Gibsons on the Sunshine Coast

I like to write but finding inspiration about what to write about can sometimes be the hardest part. This week I was busy with a project which took way long than I thought it was going to. Don't they always? Anyway the result was that I finally finished the long project on the day that an article deadline came up. On top of that there was my blog post which I usually try to post on Friday, the day before it goes live.

The fact that my article was for the BCGS journal helps though, because once I thought of what I could write for that, it usually provides a similar topic to write about here. And it did. When writing about a recent trip to the Sunshine Coast of BC, I realized that I have neglected a whole family of relatives on my family tree. Some of them ended up living on the Sunshine Coast and I actually met them in person once, but that was when I was just lightly interested in family history in that time before it took over so many of my waking hours. 

Being a novice was my excuse then but it won't wash now. But thinking about those family connections and how I have neglected them, makes me realize they are prime candidates to put in my plan for when I next visit the FamilySearch Library. I better start that plan before something else comes up. 

For Remembrance Day

 

                                  On Remembrance Day

                      we remember those who have fought

                  in our more recent wars. It is good to honour

            them for their service but it must be remembered that

        war affects more than those in the various military services.

    War can and does affect also those who live through the conflict 

                         as well as those who come later. 

Strength from family history

 

                                                            Battle of Britain-Blitz, Dawn by Joseph Gray

I get reminder emails about watching Ask the Experts, a series of interviews that Diahan Southard does with various experts in the genetic genealogy community. They take place on Your DNA Guide's YouTube channel. The one this past week snuck up on me but I tuned in on time to see it live. Her guest was Judy Russell, the Legal Genealogist. The discussion was interesting and one of the things that Judy said really rang true for me.

I can't remember her exact words, but Judy talked about how knowing one's family stores gives people, particularly young people, strength and resilience. She cited the men and women who made the trek west by wagon train to claim new land. My thoughts didn't stray back that far but I can attest to this. When I was going through a particularly trying time in my life, I found strength by invoking memories of my grandmothers. They both lived in London at the time of the blitz in WWII. The thought of them coping with the disruption and fear that the constant bombing brought gave me the fortitude to get through my day to day life in trying circumstances. Knowing they had been able to carry on told me that I could too. 

Images:

Battle of Britain- Blitz, Dawn image: a view from the north bank of the River Thames in London over towards the Shot Tower on the south bank. A few civilians are walking on the pavement in the foreground. Clouds of smoke, showing evidence of fires caused by German air raids, are visible on the horizon.

Gray, Joseph - http://media.iwm.org.uk/iwm/mediaLib//281/media-281466/large.jpg This photograph Art.IWM ART 15672 6  comes from the collections of the Imperial War Museums

Deadlines and research plans

 

I like to keep busy but sometimes I think I overdo it. Maybe I have too many irons in the fire. The writerly part of my soul is busy this weekend learning more about the craft of writing at the Surrey International Writers Conference. But at the beginning of this week, a friend reminded me that she had asked me earlier about going back to Salt Lake City and the genealogist in me took over.

So that's just two things, right? Well maybe but research trips to the FamilySearch Library take more time planning for than the actual hours spent on the ground in the genealogist's mecca. And then there's writing. It's great to learn new stuff at the conference but then the best thing to do is to apply the most promising techniques before forgetting the reasons behind them.

In the meantime, I have some other deadlines to meet this coming week. I guess I better get writing but maybe I should plan which subjects to concentrate on first. 

DNA update: confused by new Ancestry Origin results

 

Periodically Ancestry updates what they used to call their ethnicity results which are now found under Origins. It's always interesting to see how things have changed but this latest iteration of my results has me scratching my head. After past updates I've heard complaints about how Ancestry had amped up testers' Scottish origins when they didn't feel that was right. Now I have a similar complaint but in another direction.

As someone with an Irish surname at birth, I'd previously found Ancestry's estimate of my Irish background on the low side. It made me question how my family name had been bestowed back when my lot first ended up in London. But the other DNA sites where I'd tested made me feel better about the origins of my family line: FTDNA's result showed 13% Ireland while Living DNA showed 7% Ireland. Now with the change in their estimates, Ancestry has whittled down my Irish origins to 1% and, as a new wrinkle, they've added 2% from Cornwall. I'm not sure where the Cornish bit comes from, nothing that shows up in my genealogy, that's for sure. 

Once I'd finished shaking my head over my new results, I checked those for my son whose Ancestry kit I manage. His Ireland region has a value of 13%, of which 6% is from his father and 7% is from his mother. Wait a minute, if my DNA is only 1% from Ireland how could I have passed on 7% to my child? That's almost as baffling as the Virginia & Eastern Kentucky Settlers that Ancestry linked me to in one of their previous updates. 

Life as a widow in the second half of the 19th century

 

                                                                 A Romanized image of a washerwoman in Paris 

Although still in her early 40s at the time of her husband's death, Sarah Minister Cavanagh didn't remarry. The 1861 census found her at yet another address from the ill-fated one at 31 Devonshire Street which had seen the death of two of her children as well as her husband, Benjamin. According to the census, sharing the accommodation with Sarah were her son, Henry, and daughters, Maria and Emma. Henry was 16 and employed as a shoe black. As a widow Sarah's occupation was also listed. She was a washerwoman. In 1871 this changed to charwoman only to change back again to washerwoman in the 1881 census.

A Dictionary of Old Trades, Titles and Occupations, defines a washerwoman as: "A person who 'took in' other people's washing into her own home for a fixed fee. As opposed to a laundry woman who did the same job in a commercial establishment." Whatever her employment, it was manual labour which makes me question if she had book learning. If she was self-employed she must have been able to keep a tally. Beyond the sheer physicality of the work gave me respect for her stamina. It wasn't as though there was running water readily available or washing machines when it comes to that. She was still performing this work after the age of 65. But in those days the choices were supporting yourself or resorting to the workhouse. Not a decision to be taken lightly. 

Sources:

Ancestry.com census returns

Waters, Colin A Dictionary of Old Trades, Titles and Occupations, Countryside Books, Berkshire, 2002  

Image:

Washerwoman pic

By Giovanni Boldini - https://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2018/tableaux-omp-19me-sculpture-pf1809/lot.188.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=85308359

A closer look at Sarah Minister/Cavanagh's moves through London

 

                                                Sarah would have been close to this river in her moves through London

Sarah Minister/Cavanagh and her family rarely stayed in one place for long while living in London and, while I have lots of addresses for them, it was had to pinpoint the actual places they were living in on Charles Booth's Poverty Map (1886-1903). Most of the addresses were for places, courts or yards. Those designations sound like smaller geographical areas than streets so were probably less likely to be written on the map. The actually poverty legend that Booth's maps were noted for was very patchy throughout the areas I was looking at; Whitechapel, Finsbury, Stepney and St George's in the East. The map didn't add much to my knowledge of the family's circumstances.

While Benjamin was alive he worked at various jobs in the building trade. It is hard to say if Sarah also worked for a wage. Did her husband support her and the nine children they had together? Not that the children stayed home for long. The only census which showed most of the family together was the 1851 census, the last one in which father Benjamin was still the head of the household. Even that showed only 7 of the 9 children as Emma was not yet born and Matilda was absent. Perhaps Matilda was in the infirmary as she died in 1853.

The deaths in the family give credence to the idea that they were not living in the healthiest of situations so perhaps they were among the less well off in whichever area of the city they were in. Even after the death of her husband, Sarah continued to move from place to place in London. Maybe that was how it was done in the East End. 

 

Sources:

Charles Booth’s Poverty Map (1886-1903) https://booth.lse.ac.uk/map